You know what is the problem with India?
It’s the Muslims.
India has been under Muslim rule since 1001 (when Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi defeated Raja Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Gandhara) till 1857 when the last of Muslim ruler Bahadur Shah Zafar (a reluctant leader) was captured. But still Muslims constitute less than 1/7 of the Indian population.
Muslims had the largest armies and controlled the most fertile lands for 800, yet they were unsuccessful in eliminating a threat. Why?
Is it because they were too genteel to force their subjects to adopt their faith?
At any given point of time in the country’s history, you are more likely to find a Hindu dominated area in a region under a prolonged Muslim rule (>100 years) than a Muslim dominated area under a Hindu ruler. Why?
If Akbar and other secular Muslim rulers would have seen Hindus of today, they might have probably sanctioned genocides rather than fund a Golden Temple.
When I see a communal violence, I do not know whom to blame.
Should I blame Muslims from this lack of foresight or should I blame Hindus for not being civilized?
Inherently we Hindus are fanatics who worship Swastika. During 3rd century BC we brutally exiled all the Buddhist cults that flourished during the time of Ashoka. Then 3 centuries later, we killed the Disciples of Christ who landed in Kerela.
Do you know what happened on the day India got Independence? These fanatics went back to their barbaric ways. They would have succeeded 60 years ago, had that old man in khadi was not there. But today, under the able leadership of Shiv Sena and VHP, this country shall be cleansed of beef eaters.